Teilen Sie Ihre Erfahrunge und Wünsche mit uns und anderen Usern!

Circular conveyor belt
Hi
I wanted to achieve a circular conveyordemo effect (Fig1), a reference to radialConveyordemo (Fig2), but the MU transported in a circular conveyordemo is skewed in position, and I froze the XYZ rotation of the MU
Fig 1
Fig 2

Transport Surface - Issue with "Change Constraints on Enter / Exit"
I am having difficulty with changing constraints on enter/exit of a transport surface. I get the following errors in runtime.
NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object
realvirtual.TransportsurfaceCollider.OnCollisionEnter (UnityEngine.Collision other) (at Assets/realvirtual/TransportsurfaceCollider.cs:29)
UnityEngine.Physics:OnSceneContact(PhysicsScene, IntPtr, Int32)
NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object
realvirtual.TransportsurfaceCollider.OnCollisionExit (UnityEngine.Collision other) (at Assets/realvirtual/TransportsurfaceCollider.cs:41)
UnityEngine.Physics:OnSceneContact(PhysicsScene, IntPtr, Int32)
Now for the strange part, the transport surface IS correctly setting the constraint on enter (Freeze position x in my case), but this constraint does not get removed on exit. I do have "Change constraints on exit" set to true and "none" set for the constraints exit. In the "Loaded Part" list in the transport surface, there are no objects listed in runtime even though there are game objects on the transport surface.
Has anyone else ran into this issue before? Seems weird that I am getting that error on enter, but the constraint is still getting set correctly.

Questions about Modbus TCP connection to Siemens 200smart
May I ask if your company has launched the modbus client access function? I need to enter an IP and PORT to access Siemens 200smart PLC.

IK Limits
I'm working on some digital twin of a 6 axis arm robot and would like to use the IK.
I actually have something that's currently working fine, but we've found out that some of the joints are reverse and that one of them needs an offset. However - once I fix all that the IK breaks.
I saw in the documentation that there are some strict limitations.
I just wanted to understand where am I still free to play around, and if it's possible to fix the IK somehow:
1. Can I reverse the joint's direction (the bottom two are fine but the rest need reversing)?
2. Can I add an offset so that when the 3rd joint is at 0 angle the robot will be at 90 degrees?
3. If not - is there some recommended method to convert the values so that they would fit the real values?

About the problem of reconnecting the s7plc to the caton
Hello, I have a question. If there are a lot of devices with a lot of IP, the PLC that is not turned on will be reconnected over time, and reconnecting the PLC over time will cause the program to stall, which will greatly affect the use. May I ask how to solve the problem of reconnecting over and over?

Hi, there would be changes in the code needed. Currently we don't assume that devices are off and on during simulation. The source code is open you would need to change the way how reconnection is done - maybe by using the new Awaitable System in Unity6

Questions about the use of s7 PLC
When using S7Interface, some S7Interface can connect to many points, and some S7Interface will be disconnected if the number of connections is too large, please see the picture, as if: Negotiated Pdu Lenght is related to this value. May I ask how Negotiated Pdu Lenght is set? Why is it 480 or 240? If Negotiated Pdu Lenght is 240, too many signals cannot be connected.
There is also a question about: how to use the Area Read Write Mode, if I need to read 56 points from the PLC's DB block and write 12 points, how should I fill in the configuration.
Looking forward to your reply very much!



Hi, I can't tell you in detail why the negotiated Pdu lenght is like that. We use Sharp7 as a basis library for the S7 communication. I think this defines the length of the telegrams but it does not defines the number of the signals. If needed multiple telegrams are send for covering all signals. On AreaReadWrite Mode you sould enter min and max adress - so if your DB is 100.X to 140.X you should enter 100 and 140.

Bag is not moving with RGV
A693 - Windows, Mac, Linux - Unity 2022.3.3....mp4
I want to move the bag which is shown in project with RGV. But unable to do it. When i am giving forward command to RGV, RGV is moving forward but the bag is not moving with RGV. Last time you had shared a link for reference (https://doc.realvirtual.io/components-and-scripts/motion/transportsurface#transport-surfaces-and-unity-physics).
But i couldn't get it. Please suggest the solution step by step.

Problem with Drive with AGX
Using Realvirtual Release 2022.18 Build 5747
I'm trying to enable a drive while using AGX Physics for collisions.
This is the scene I'm using for testing. I'm trying to move the beam on top of the platform and have made colliders in AGX for both. Then I configured a prismatic constraint on the beam through AGX.
Then I followed the instructions of https://doc.realvirtual.io/extensions/agx-physics
I set the lock on of the constraint of the Rigid Body.
Then I configured the Drive. I put direction on Virtual. Then I added an Erratic Driver.
But when I run the beam doesn't move. Only when I disable the Rigid Body and put the Direction not on virtual the beam moves, but that means disabling AGX Physics. How can I make the beam move while still using AGX?

Hi, how long took it in total? Yes our Step file is not always very fast and it could happen that you need to wait more than 15mins for bigger files.
Customer support service by UserEcho