I've been using realvirtual.io for a week. But I'm struggling with kinematics links modeling.

As I see in your documentation, you are using either parenting or dynamics on game objects.

The thing is, for certain kinematics chains, neither technique worked...

There is futher example of mechanism i need to model :

There is a way to model complex kinematics chains (Without using mass and force)?

Model-Pose1

STEP File

Yesterday, I tried to dive deeper into the kinematics of more "complex" objects in Unity. However, I reached my limits when working on the kinematics of the model in the attached image, and I wanted to ask for your assessment of the complexity involved.

From my experience, chaining linear and independent movements doesn't seem to be a problem. However, combining rotational and linear movements appears to be more complex.

The model is actually a relatively simple construction. On a base-plate, there is a rotatable and driven turret. At the top of this turret, there is a shaft driven by a motor, which, through a connecting rod-like mechanism, is supposed to exert a linear movement on the "sleeve" around the turret. I have illustrated this with two images.

I have tried various combinations of kinematic chains and also tested the use of Unity's internal joints like the "Hinge Joint." I always got to the point where I still needed to add the linear movement of the sleeve. However, I couldn't implement this final step under the conditions of the existing movements.

In general, I have the following questions:

• Is it possible to use the joints provided by Unity in combination with the drives from Realvirtual?
• Are there any similar "joints" from Realvirtual that constrain kinematic movement (i.e., without additional drive)?
• I had the feeling that a functioning kinematics heavily depends on the hierarchical arrangement of the game objects. It seems that the linear constraint of the sleeve to the turret doesn't work due to the hierarchy. Do you have any tips or rules that need to be followed, and is such a kinematic chain as desired in the model even possible?

I have also attached the STEP file of this model and would appreciate any feedback.

I want to interface the realvirtual digital twin with a c# application. The c# application already exists and controls resources like motors with resource commands. The commands are already expressed in a message that is send via TCP. No PLC is used.

An example message would be:

- message type -> eg resource command request

- object id -> eg Xaxis

- command id -> eg move

- parameters -> eg position, speed, acceleration and deceleration parameters

The individual parameters in the message are extracted from the message by a decoding procedure.

I would like to use an industry standard like MQTT (or OPC UA) to interface with the digital twin. Therefore the TCP message has to be converted to a MQTT message.

I have limited knowledge in this area, but from what I understand is that the digital twin requires signals. Drive_DestinationMotor for example requires 5 PLC outputs and 4 PLC inputs, the PLC outputs/inputs should be mapped to signals, signals should be connected to MQTT topics, each MQTT topic represents 1 signal. Am I right?

I can understand how to convert the TCP message to multiple MQTT messages, but how can I make sure that parameters like position and speed signals are received all at once or before the actual "start drive" signal?

Are there examples available on how to do this or should I use a different approach? What would happen when I replace Drive_DestinationMotor by a controller with states? Are there examples of such a controller?

Hallo,

wie kann ich die oben genannten Pakete noch nutzen?

Ich habe die Assets direkt über unity gekauft im Dezember 2022.

Wenn ich jetzt ein frisches Projekt anlege (aktuelles Unity 2021 LTS) bekomme ich haufenweise Fehler.

Hello

I have a requirement to reproduce the gripping and placing of a SCARA robotic arm. My current idea is to divide the model into joints and add Drive components to the axis position of each joint, so that it can be moved, so as to achieve the process of motion restoration. But when I use the rotation function of the drive component, I find that it can only rotate all the time, can I set an angle for the drive component to rotate only the angle I set?

Or can you see if there is a better way to simulate the movement of a SCARA robot?

I don't need to add complicated IK algorithms, I just want to give the rotation angle of each axis of the SRACA robotic arm and let it rotate to the target position.

Thanks

Hallo Thomas,

ich bekomme keine Verbindung von Unity zu PLCSimAdvanced V5.0. Bei Simulationsstart kommt jedes mal die Fehlermeldung (in Unity):

"You need to download PLCSimAdvancedCoupler.exe and place it into the \PLCSimAdvanced\Ressources\ folder"

Die genannte .exe habe ich im in meinem Projekt - Ablageordner unter:

C:\Unity Projekte\Zuluftanlage\Assets\realvirtual\Interfaces\PLCSimAdvanced\Ressources

abgelegt. Dennoch scheint Unity die .exe nicht zu finden. Auch die "Siemens.Simatic.Simulation.Runtime.Api.x86.dll" hab ich im entsprechenden Ablageordner für PLCSimAdvanced V5.0 abgelegt unter:

C:\Program Files (x86)\Common Files\Siemens\PLCSIMADV\API\5.0

Was ich weiter versucht habe ist:

- deinstallieren von "Npcap 1.71" und installieren von "Npcap 1.79"

- bilden einer Instanz in PLCSimAdvanced mit Konfiguration PLCSIM sowie TCP/IP 

- deaktivieren der Windows - Firewall

- starten der PLCSimAdvancedCoupler.exe manuell (Fehlermeldung siehe Screenshot!)

Geladen wurde die PLCSimAdvanced Instanz mit TIA Portal V18. Anbei befinden sich ein paar Screenshot.

Viele Grüße

David

How can I prevent a jumping MU on a (guided) conveyor?

For this I used the invisible conveyor system from your demo project "Guided Transport".

The MU stops at the stopper but starts jumping up and down immediatetly. 

Is there an easy way to prevent this? 

I played around with the Rigidbody parameters and realised it stops if I activate "Is Kinematic". I guess I could do this by writing a scripts that activates this parameter at collision with transport layer.

Hello, it seems like we are having an issue with the OPCUA4Unity asset that we want to use for our Hololens build. We created a new project and were able to create a build for the Hololens without any problems. We then imported the asset from the Asset Store and tried to build again, but to no avail. We didn't add the demo scene into the build, so the problem is not with the scene itself. The build settings match the attached screenshot.

After creating the build in Unity, we open the build folder in Visual Studio and launch the .sln file. We select the Release, ARM64 and Device options and start the process. However, the build process gets stuck at a certain point, as shown in the screenshot.

Greetings.

I am using S7 TCP/IP connection on a Unity project and I am physically connected to an S7-1200.

I am using various PLC Inputs and Outputs (created automatically from the .sdf file).

The PLC outputs are being read correctly on Unity, but when I force (overrite) a BOOL input value, the PLC detects the change but does not hold the new value. For example, I can see on the TIA Portal monitor window that the value is FALSE. I press write to True on Unity but the monitor on TIA Portal still shows False, although it did acknowledge the pulse (mabye it was a very short pulse)? Is this the way writing to PLC inputs works? By pulses? Because I would like to change a boolean (or any other type) value and hold that state for long periods of time.

These are my settings for the S7 Interface

And this is an example of a PLC Input component (Is it normal that the component is deactivated during runtime??):

This is the correspondent GameObject during runtime:

Thanks for your time!

When I choose the WebGl plat for build my unity projects which use realVirtual-io tool, the system has the follow error:

"Assets\realvirtual\private\Interfaces\SharedMemory\Editor\SharedMemoryInterfaceEditor.cs(9,26): error CS0246: The type or namespace name 'SharedMemoryInterface' could not be found (are you missing a using directive or an assembly reference?)"。